Disputatio:Biblia Sacra Vulgata (Stuttgartensia)/Genesis

E Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search

XLI => 41 ? Should be LCI => 151

I am willing to split this huge page into books. however, the titles seem to have some typos, and I do not know who to correct them. could someone fix them? ThomasV 08:26, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

A lacking book in the Bible[recensere]

What about the book of Ruth?

What about Osee /Hosea?

Copyright Issue[recensere]

The Stutgart Bible is copyrighted.

Should we replace this copyrighted text with the text from The Clementine Vulgate Project, released in public domain?
--Antlem (disputatio) 07:01, 23 Augusti 2018 (UTC)
Of course if this text is copyrighted, it cannot be published in Wikimedia projects, and it has to be replaced. But another issue, how can a Vulgata Bible of Stuttgart be under copyright? It is an ancient text. --Tn4196 (disputatio) 14:59, 9 Septembris 2018 (UTC)

Another missing book[recensere]

What about Hosea?

This text need a deep proofreading, I insert the template {{textquality|0%}}. Anyone could contribute, inserting a new text with well-known source. --Accurimbono 08:27, 4 Iulii 2007 (UTC)

Printed and on-line text sources[recensere]

  1. This text can be found printed in the Biblia Sacra Vulgata Editio quinta:
    • ISBN: 978-3-438-05303-9
    • Author: R. Gryson, B. Fischer, H.I. Frede, H.F.D
    • Publisher: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft
    • Pages: 2032
  2. On-line sources for this text can be found at:

--LaosLos 07:09, 17 Iulii 2008 (UTC)

The online texts are different.
This texts and biblegateway.com and biblehub.com/vul/ have incorrect "loquebaturque cum Mosi" (Exodus 33, 9). thelatinlibrary.com has "loquebaturque cum Moyse" which is grammatically correct as cum is used with ablative.

Still missing[recensere]

  • Most of Daniel
  • 3 Esdras
  • 4 Esdras
  • Oratio Manassae regis
  • Laodiceans
  • Psalm 151
  • Prologues 15:35, 28 Iulii 2009 (UTC)


Nonne melius est si libros in partes discernimus? Libri cuncti difficiles sunt dum lectio (et capitula iam extant). --Tn4196 (disputatio) 18:47, 15 Decembris 2013 (UTC)