Vicifons:Scriptorium

E Wikisource

Scriptorium Vicifontis

Alia scriptoria

Vicipaedia:Taberna Vicicitatio:Taberna Victionarium:Taberna

[recensere] Formula:§

Formula:§ qui non sembra funzionare; temo dipenda dal settaggio della classe "Citazione" nel css. --Alex brollo 22:58, 16 Septembris 2008 (UTC)

[recensere] Criteria for speedy deletion

Currently the Criteria for speedy deletion are:

• Causa alia - Other
• Author request
• Copyright violation
• Vandalism

On English Wikisource and Multilingual Wikisource, we have more. We should discuss new ones, and write a policy. John Vandenberg 09:07, 24 Septembris 2008 (UTC)

Why? I remember when the English Wikipedia invented speedy deletion. It was invented because we were drowning in needless deletion discussion. The community was in general extremely wary of handing over such power/authority to administrators, but the need outweighed the risk. Where is the need here? Hesperian 23:31, 24 Septembris 2008 (UTC)

[recensere] Cross-namespace redirects

Eusebius Sophronius Hieronymus was created as a redirect to Scriptor:Sophronius Eusebius Hieronymus. On En.Wikisource, we delete this as a cross-namespace redirect. John Vandenberg 09:07, 24 Septembris 2008 (UTC)

+1 --Accurimbono (disp) 13:08, 25 Septembris 2008 (UTC)

DONE. --Accurimbono (disp) 13:16, 25 Septembris 2008 (UTC)

[recensere] New message template

Hi there, the "you have new messages" template won't go away for me for some reason, even though I have clicked it and separately clicked on my discussion page several times now - what can I do to resolve this problem? It Is Me Here 12:57, 2 Novembris 2008 (UTC)

[recensere] Unus titulus in una bibliotheca!

Sorry, Edo: "the second has explicit parameters unlike the first."

99% of text use titulus2 I think titulus2 is best.

--Accurimbono (disp) 18:35, 4 Novembris 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome, I was mistaken. You're quite right. So what about unifying the extant templates to Titulus2. Or still better, what about unifying Titulus and Titulus2 and delete this dicotomy? By the way, I like very much Formula:Navigatio and even if I still want Formula:Liber to be detached I'd trasfer its colors and borders to Formula:Titulus. Any objection? - εΔω 14:51, 11 Novembris 2008 (UTC)

Please, make an example in a sandbox, so it will be easier for everyone to undestand and compare the different templae.

Regards, --Accurimbono (disp) 19:36, 11 Novembris 2008 (UTC)

[recensere] Exemplum Exposui

Ecce exemplum, quod hãc formulã utitur. These are my ideas:

• I took the structure from titulus2, then I changed
• Aesthetics: Author's name before title name : compare Carmina_(Catullus)/46 with my example.
• Aesthetics: Colours are added to put some light.
• Parameters: I kept explicit parameters (but renamed a wrong operaeTitulus to a right OperisTitulus)

I don't think this to be definitive: comments and edits are welcome. - εΔω 09:54, 11 Decembris 2008 (UTC)

+1 --Accurimbono (disp) 14:52, 12 Decembris 2008 (UTC)

[recensere] richieste di nuovi testi

dove si può mettere la richiesta di testi mancanti? (così come su wikipedia c'è la pagina richiesta di nuove voci...) Ho notato che mancano su Wikisource (e pure su internet in generale) alcuni testi importanti:

• Albertino Mussato, Ecerinis
• Marsilio da Padova, Defensor Pacis
• John of Salisbury, Polichraticus
• Poliphylus

Ringrazio per la gentile provocazione. Non si può promettere nulla, ma almeno ora abbiamo qualche stimolo in più. Proverò a sfucugliare per la rete e per qualche biblioteca... - εΔω 17:28, 10 Decembris 2008 (UTC)

[recensere] Localisation

You need to localise:

• new PDF/create a book strings (they are in English) - although lawiki and lawiktionary seem to have disabled that extension altogether
• edit toolbar titles (they are mostly in French)

Sorry I can't provide these for you. This, that and the other 08:15, 22 Aprilis 2009 (UTC)

[recensere] Taccola

Salve, I would like to include De Ingeneis, a technological treatise in medieval Latin by Taccola (see WP.EN), an Italian artist-engineer and predecessor of Leonardo da Vinci. I have the complete scan (25 pages) here which I can make available to all interested editors. Basically, the text can be simply pasted, and then it only needs proof-reading. However, being new, I am not acquainted with Wikisource. Who would collaborate on the project? Regards Gun Powder Ma 01:19, 23 Aprilis 2009 (UTC)

This sounds like a good project. We first need to verify that the scans are free of copyright, so we need to know the edition that you have scanned, and who did the scanning. Once that is resolved, the images should be converted into a djvu file (we can help you with that). John Vandenberg 08:13, 17 Iulii 2009 (UTC)

The book is from 1969. AFAIK, transcriptions cannot be copyrighted, since they lack the required level of creativity. Pasting and proof-reading the text thus IMO constitutes no problem. Gun Powder Ma 12:04, 21 Iulii 2009 (UTC)

[recensere] Summa logicae copyright

There has been a discussion about Summa logicae on w:en:Wikipedia Review where it was pointed out that our text was not good quality[1].

Hiroshige (talk • contribs) has since changed our pages, and again on Wikipedia Review it has been suggested there may be a copyright problem with the new text.[2] John Vandenberg 08:28, 17 Iulii 2009 (UTC)

[recensere] Formula:V, levis mutatio

Levissimam mutationem nuper feci, delens verbum versiculus, ut ab omnibus facilius subtitulationes scribi possent.

Olim [[Titulus/Caput#versiculus345]] scribendum erat ut nexus a formula creati coniungerentur,
Nunc [[Titulus/Caput#345]] satis est.

Si displicet... sine mora revertatur. - εΔω 22:21, 18 Iulii 2009 (UTC)

[recensere] What's the color of a Talk:?

Does Litaniae sanctissimi nominis Domini nostri Iesu Christi has a talk-page Talk:Litaniae sanctissimi nominis Domini nostri Iesu Christi or not?

When I am on the page Litaniae sanctissimi nominis Domini nostri Iesu Christi and want to see the talk page, I am redirected to Fons:Litaniae sanctissimi nominis Domini nostri Iesu Christi, a red page, and strange since it look's like the latin word for Talk: is Disputatio:.

Let's see if Disputatio:Litaniae sanctissimi nominis Domini nostri Iesu Christi is red or not?

- No, it's blue! -- Lavallen 07:40, 4 Octobris 2009 (UTC) (Confused!)

P.S Now, I've seen the same behavior on other pages. I'm redirected to red talk:-pages starting with Fons:, when they should be blue... Lavallen 07:40, 4 Octobris 2009 (UTC)

Work's fine now, when I have la as my language under Praeferentiae meae, but not with en or sv. -- Lavallen 11:34, 4 Octobris 2009 (UTC)

The problem is the following script in MediaWiki:Monobook.js:

function tabulae()
{
   //tabula secunda
   if( document.getElementById("infoedit") )
       {
          var b = document.getElementById("ca-talk");
          if(b){
                var s = b.innerHTML;
                var i = s.lastIndexOf('Disputatio');
                b.innerHTML = s.substring(0,i)+"Fons"+s.substring(i+10,s.length-1);
                }
       }
}

s.lastIndexOf('Disputatio'); will get the wrong when the text an the talk tab is not "Disputatio". I think it will work for other languages too, if an administrator replaces that script with the following:

function tabulae() {
   //tabula secunda
   if( document.getElementById("infoedit") ) {
      var b = document.getElementById("ca-talk");
      if (b) { b.childNodes[0] = "Fons"; }
   }
}

/EnDumEn 16:10, 4 Octobris 2009 (UTC)

Done. Does it work? - εΔω 13:38, 11 Octobris 2009 (UTC)

Looks fine, than You! -- Lavallen 13:11, 17 Octobris 2009 (UTC)

[recensere] Letter by Erasmus of Rotterdam

Hi there, I have a scan (two pages) of a transcribed letter from Erasmus to Gaspar Schets from a book written by two British people. Since the letter would be a nice addition to w:d:Freiburger Bächle, I'd love to have it published here. What exactly do I have to do? Would someone like to guide me? --Flominator 19:00, 19 Octobris 2009 (UTC)