Disputatio Usoris:Aramgar

E Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Aprilis 2008[recensere]

G'day, welcome to Vicifons. Jayvdb 07:57, 19 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)[reply]


welcome, great work with catullus! please continue and... finish, if possible! :) hi! --Accurimbono 18:29, 16 Maii 2008 (UTC)[reply]

working with djvu files[recensere]

Wow! It looks like you are enjoying yourself here! I notice that you are yet to try out the new technology developed for Wikisource, which you can see here: Liber:De assensione Stoici quid senserint.djvu. It would be good if we can finished proofreading that book so that Latin Wikisource has an example of top quality work. On en.Wikisource we have some documentation: en:Help:Side by side image view for proofreading and en:Help:Djvu.

There are more sets of pagescans in Categoria:Index, and the stats are here. Jayvdb 02:29, 22 Iunii 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have set up Liber:Hymni Ecclesiae.djvu and uploaded the first 50 pages of OCR. see also Vicifons:Scriptorium#interface translation requests. John Vandenberg 09:42, 29 Iunii 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Two replies here. --John Vandenberg 11:58, 1 Iulii 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Not too) speedy deletion[recensere]

Dear Aramgar,

before having interesting material deleted, let me have a try on it.wikipedia and it.wikisource. There's a wikiproject about Rome, anther one about Latin language and a third one about Archeology. I have known "live" some Roman users, so I'm sending out an SOS to see if any bold photographer could give us a scannedvisual source. Cross your finger... - εΔω 09:13, 7 Iulii 2008 (UTC)

We could also tag these as {{Infectus}} for a while. We dont delete incomplete works on English Wikisource, as they are useful to bring in searchers. The hope is that some searchers will read the message and think "I can fix this oversight". John Vandenberg 14:26, 7 Iulii 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amores: 3 Libri -> 1 WS Book?[recensere]

Hi Aramgar,

I have thought that maybe we could joint the 3 latin Libri into 1 ws book, by linking Amores 1.15 and Amores 2.1 using the Formula: Liber . In fact, if Amores should be published on paper nowadays it would be just one book. I suggest that because I have seen that you have previously done so and later you have undone it.

--LaosLos 06:50, 19 Iulii 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LaosLos, I am slowly changing the formatting so that I can make Amores one work with fifty-two subpages. I can certainly restore the link between Amores 1.15 and Amores 2.1 if you think that best. Please pardon my slow pace: I am on the road. Regards, Aramgar 17:43, 19 Iulii 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fons masculinus[recensere]

{{done}}... er... Factum. I changed two vowels in two pages then I created a new category with the roght title. Now I'm deleting the wrong category (with its talk page). If you want to save that talkdrop me a line and I'll move it where you like. - εΔω 17:22, 22 Octobris 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Aramgar 17:56, 22 Octobris 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I have suggested that we presume that you have resigned the mop here: Vicifons:Scriptorium#Retired_Sysop. I am posting here to give you notice and I will send an e-mail.--Doug.(Disputatio Conlationes) 17:46, 18 Februarii 2011 (UTC)[reply]

e-mail sent.--Doug.(Disputatio Conlationes) 17:48, 18 Februarii 2011 (UTC)[reply]