Disputatio Usoris:JimKillock
Partem novam addereSalve!
[recensere]Salve JimKillock!
Vicifontium amici
|
Zyephyrus (disputatio) 14:24, 16 Augusti 2019 (UTC)
span
[recensere]please wait to add <span id="ws-cover"> in the pages; I will add a parameter for that in the revised Formula:Titulus. just give me some time till monday :) --Barbaking (disputatio) 07:57, 29 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)
- Sure :) was just seeing if it works on other exports – I will remove once I've exported one or two. JimKillock (disputatio) 07:58, 29 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)
- ok, it was just to be sure :). the template will have a parameter Frons= to specify the (eventual) cover page, like this (seems to work). now, we have to understand why the export fails with pdf, and how/if we can center the resulting image... --Barbaking (disputatio) 08:26, 29 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)
hi, I just wanted to inform you that at the link above on Meta they are looking for comments or feedbacks about the export of Wikisource contents as ebooks; since you seemed interested in the matter, feel free to join the conversation there if you want :) have a nice day, --Barbaking (disputatio) 11:57, 28 Maii 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! Will take a look. JimKillock (disputatio) 12:30, 17 Iunii 2020 (UTC)
Colloquia Erasmi
[recensere]Salve! Optime fecisti quod transcriptionem Colloquiorum aggressus es, quo in opere libenter te adjuvabo. Qui in Vicifonte tiro sim, dubius sum: https://la.wikisource.org/wiki/Disputatio_Libri:Erasmi_Colloquia_Familiaria_Et_Encomium_Moriae.djvu Etiam nescio quam ob rem efficere non possum ut alter dialogus in propria pagina appareat: https://la.wikisource.org/wiki/Colloquia_familiaria/Epithalamium_Petri_Aegidii --Quasus (disputatio) 19:10, 16 Septembris 2020 (UTC)
- Formula:At Salve Quaese! Et multas gratias! Corrigo hoc paginam, et addere aliquae notae formatae. JimKillock (disputatio)
We sent you an e-mail
[recensere]Hello JimKillock,
Really sorry for the inconvenience. This is a gentle note to request that you check your email. We sent you a message titled "The Community Insights survey is coming!". If you have questions, email surveys@wikimedia.org.
You can see my explanation here.
MediaWiki message delivery (disputatio) 18:52, 25 Septembris 2020 (UTC)
De italico
[recensere]Typographi me docebant numquam voces Graecas scriptura italica (sic) designare; nam scriptura Graeca usitata ipsa per se italica est. In libro, quem transcribimus, verba Graeca non italico designata sunt, — ipsa scriptura italica est. Sed si putas sic recte esse, cum continuero, designabo Graeca italico. Demetrius Talpa (disputatio) 20:03, 17 Martii 2021 (UTC)
- @Demetrius Talpa: Puto tu recte dicis; formae litterae in libro sunt quasi-italicae, sed nescio quomodo litterae graeciae sint. Non est magni momenti! Possumus eligere formam te putare recte esse. Et multas gratias! JimKillock (disputatio) 20:08, 17 Martii 2021 (UTC)
Ora Maritima: English or Latin?
[recensere]I've added Sonnenschein's Ora Maritima to Wikisource. I accidentally added it to the English namespace. I'm not sure I was wrong, though. Ora Maritima has a lot of exercises and so on that are written in English. So I'm not sure whether to view it as a Latin book with English bits or an English book about Latin. What do you think? I'd like to get this resolved before I start editing the pages, because I think migrating it across namespaces will be a pain if there are a lot of pages to move. Persimmon and Hazelnut (disputatio) 15:30, 7 Octobris 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @Persimmon and Hazelnut: I think the case is arguable either way; things are a bit more relaxed here but there are more users at en.ws; maybe ask on their forum before pressing ahead? Either way I will try to give you a bit of help with it. --JimKillock (disputatio) 20:36, 9 Octobris 2021 (UTC)
Suggestion
[recensere]Hello! How are you?
My name is Erick, I'm from Brazil, and I have added this work by Bartolomeu de Gusmão at the Multilingual Wikisource, since it is pretty much a French-Latin bilingual book. You might find it interesting and, if possible, I would like to know if the writing "Bartholomæus de Gusmão" (at the "Scriptor" page) is correct. He was a quite fascinating character and also mastered the Latin-language (I have tried to find more Latin-language versions of his works online, but to no avail). I've found the Latin-language quite interesting, and I hope to learn it enough for reading and writing some day (but grammar lessons don't really work with me) to edit here and in the Latin Wiki. Cheers! Erick Soares3 (disputatio) 00:11, 16 Novembris 2024 (UTC)