Disputatio Usoris:VIGNERON

E Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Salve VIGNERON!

Knowledge of Latin is not required on this project, and we thank you for assisting us. Feel free to use English, German, French or Italian when communicating with other users.

In disputationibus mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit.

Omnibus links:

Gratus sis apud vicifontes! John Vandenberg 00:06, 10 Decembris 2009 (UTC)

iwpage[recensere]

Please see follow up question here: Disputatio_Usoris:Fabrice_Dury#What_are_you_doing.3F. What do you mean by "real iw-transclusion". Also, I beg to differ, {{iwpage}} is not the best thing we have, importing the text so that it's effectively transcribed on both subdomains is actually substantially better in the long run because both subdomains can format according to local policy, templates, and css.--Doug.(Disputatio Conlationes) 21:48, 5 Septembris 2011 (UTC)

Thank you[recensere]

Thanks for correcting my horrific French. I rely on 3 years of school more than 20 years ago, wiktionary and google translate (which isn't good with French). I often find I am horribly monolingual. :-\ --Doug.(Disputatio Conlationes) 07:41, 9 Septembris 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. Indeed, French isn't easy.
If you need help to translate anything, don't hesitate to contact me.
Cdlt, VIGNERON 08:27, 9 Septembris 2011 (UTC)

Promotions[recensere]

Please see: Vicifons:Magistratus for five crat nominations and two admin nominations. Please indicate your acceptance and vote/comment on the others. Thank you.--Doug.(Disputatio Conlationes) 09:08, 4 Octobris 2011 (UTC)

Administrator[recensere]

Congratulations, in case you didn't notice, you are now an Administrator per Accurimbono [1].--Doug.(Disputatio Conlationes) 09:16, 25 Octobris 2011 (UTC)

I noticed, but thanks for the reminder.
By the way, I'm kind of busy on others projects (wikiprojects and IRLprojects too) but I stay around, don't hesitate to contact me whenever you want.
Cdlt, VIGNERON 10:17, 25 Octobris 2011 (UTC)

Proofreadpage header[recensere]

Reference your question at Disputatio Usoris:Doug#MediaWiki:Proofreadpage header template:

I took a look and the problem seems to be that the MediaWiki:Proofreadpage header template is not set up to deal with the Scriptor parameter being wikified - see that removing the wikilink here Liber:Divini Platonis Opera omnia quæ exstant.djvu fixes the header on Clitopho. But not being able to link the scriptor from the index page is undesirable. Maybe there is a solution on fr:MediaWiki:Proofreadpage header template, though it is complex (I think phe said it's a mess). I will take a look and consult with phe. I'm not eager to use this header code yet until we've sorted out what sort of header is desirable, but I will pursue the technical side.--Doug.(Disputatio Conlationes) 16:19, 19 Novembris 2011 (UTC)

Consider: fr:L’Internationale, there is a solution there, but it will take me a while to parse the code in their template.--Doug.(Disputatio Conlationes) 16:22, 19 Novembris 2011 (UTC)
Yep, I've seen the scriptor problem and understood it. But I didn't manage to understand how to solve it.
I completely agree, the link should be in the titulus formula and in the liber namespace.
The french header seems to work fine with that but it's really a mess and I'm not an expert in code (I can handle and copy it but I'm afraid to change it since I didn't understand all the part of it).
There is no rush, it's better to do it fine better than do it in hurry. And it could be a good occasion to harmoniza a little bit the things (I remember that br:MediaWiki:Proofreadpage header template doesn't work very well too).
Cdlt, VIGNERON 18:26, 19 Novembris 2011 (UTC)


Hi, I fixed this by putting into Proofreadpage header template the same content of Formula:Titulus, but without wrapping Author inside a wikilink. This way we can use the wikilink on the index page, and it will show correctly on the ns0 page. However the optimal solution would be to always write all parameters, everywhere, without the wikilink, so that they can also be used by templates to generate categories like "Category:Works by Plato", etc. But I'll leave this to another day, since it requires to change all existing pages. Candalua 14:45, 20 Novembris 2011 (UTC)

Grapheocrates nomination[recensere]

We are critically short of anything close to active users and you are far more active than I: Vicifons:Magistratus#Petitio_grapheocrates.--Doug.(Disputatio Conlationes) 15:01, 25 Ianuarii 2015 (UTC)

Deletiones Propositae[recensere]

Hello. Please take a look at Vicifons:Deletiones Propositae#February 2015. Thank you. Hausratte (disputatio) 14:36, 14 Februarii 2015 (UTC)

Pagina prima validation[recensere]

Hello again. Could you please validate Pagina prima? It has become unvalidated because of that. Thanks in advance! Hausratte (disputatio) 21:59, 26 Februarii 2015 (UTC)

Columella[recensere]

Ho segnato nell'indice di Columella come difficile che dovevo trovare il tempo di vedere se tutto andava bene o bisognava ancora intervenire, sperando che la rilettura fosse fatta da qualcun altro.Mizardellorsa (disputatio) 19:08, 31 Maii 2015 (UTC)

Deletiones Propositae[recensere]

Hello. Could you please take a look at Vicifons:Deletiones Propositae#April 2015? There's a deletion request since last year. Thank you! Hausratte (disputatio) 23:57, 1 Februarii 2016 (UTC)

Hi Hausratte,
You don't bother me at all ; don't hesitate to ask me anything!
I have a question for you too : for the Lex Salica I'm not sure if the deletion is a good idea or not. Why not keep the two editions? Isn't it interresting to have the two editions? Morevoer, I see that you marked the pages of the 1906 edition as 'problematic' but I don't see what is wrong and I don't really want to replace an edition for a problematic one.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (disputatio) 06:34, 15 Aprilis 2016 (UTC)
You see, it's not two «editions», because both of them are reprints of Lex Salica Parisian manuscript. But 1906 book is more precise and usable than 1850 book. For example, in 1906 book articles are placed in indents while 1850 book places them in continuous line. You can keep it, but it would be just a duplicate with worse typography. PS. I marked the pages as problematic because I haven't added references yet (which are in Russian); I will add them later. Hausratte (disputatio) 13:53, 16 Aprilis 2016 (UTC)
Ok, I understand, it is two editions but from the same source ; thank you for your explanation. I deleted the 1850 edition. Cdlt, VIGNERON (disputatio) 14:27, 16 Aprilis 2016 (UTC)

Hello again. Btw, could you please add French version of Lex Salica (w:fr:Loi salique) to frwikisource if you have enough time? Smiley.svg Or ask about possible contributors on their forum? There is a free text on ledroitcriminel.free.fr. Because there are titres and articles it can be organized like fr:Constitution du 3 septembre 1791. Hausratte (disputatio) 20:32, 26 Maii 2016 (UTC)