Vicifons:Deletiones Propositae

E Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search

{{Delenda}}

September 2005[recensere]

July 2006[recensere]

Aren't needed anymore. --Tolanor 00:23, 6 iulii 2006 (UTC)


September 2006[recensere]

November 2006[recensere]

  • Ad Melpomenam: malus titutlus, textus male scriptus ab usore unius contributionis... et sine fonte, cum autem aliter meliore forma idem textus reddatur. Deleatur --εΔω 18:15, 13 Novembris 2006 (UTC)
Grazie per la segnalazione! --Accurimbono 07:46, 14 Novembris 2006 (UTC)

June 2008[recensere]

Done. --Accurimbono 17:43, 26 Iunii 2008 (UTC)

January 2011[recensere]

Done --Matthead 23:32, 14 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)

October 2011[recensere]

There is some unused formulae, like : Formula:AE, Formula:Ae, or Formula:§§ (this one seem to be used on it.ws). What should we do with ? Cdlt, VIGNERON 11:42, 27 Octobris 2011 (UTC)

VIGNERON I think that he would be better to delete them as no useful content.--Grind24 (disputatio) 16:00, 25 Ianuarii 2015 (UTC)
Hi Grind24! These formulae were unused in 2011 but no more ; now they are used on lot of pages. A bot should replace them before I can delete them. Cdlt, VIGNERON (disputatio) 09:42, 2 Februarii 2015 (UTC)
D'accord Grind24 (disputatio) 05:58, 3 Februarii 2015 (UTC)

February 2015[recensere]

I[recensere]

Liber:Corpus iuris civilis (1872).pdf and non-checked pages — file on commons has been deleted. Replaced by Liber:Corpus iuris civilis (1889).djvu. Hausratte (disputatio) 09:47, 10 Februarii 2015 (UTC)

✔ Perfectum est. and I double-checked with Specialis:Praefixa/Pagina:Corpus iuris civilis (1872).pdf VIGNERON (disputatio) 15:11, 14 Februarii 2015 (UTC)

II[recensere]

Ab excessu divi Augusti (Annales)/Liber XIV. A bad job blocking the much better Ab excessu divi Augusti (Annales)/ Liber XIV from getting rid of its needless space.LlywelynII (disputatio) 13:44, 17 Februarii 2015 (UTC)

✔ Perfectum est. How do you say 'Fusion d'historiques' in Latin? --Zyephyrus (disputatio) 19:56, 7 Martii 2015 (UTC)

April 2015[recensere]

Liber:Петрушевский Д.М. Великая хартия вольностей. 1918.pdf and Specialis:Praefixa/Pagina:Петрушевский Д.М. Великая хартия вольностей. 1918.pdf — replaced by Liber:Петрушевский Д.М. (ред.). Памятники истории Англии XI-XIII вв. 1936.djvu. PS. Btw, may somebody please validate new index's pages? there are only 11 of them. Thanks in advance. Hausratte (disputatio) 17:47, 26 Aprilis 2015 (UTC)

✔ Perfectum est. Cdlt, VIGNERON (disputatio) 09:28, 2 Februarii 2016 (UTC)

May 2016[recensere]

De Re Rustica and chapters: replaced with De Re Rustica (Gesner). Hausratte (disputatio) 22:02, 21 Maii 2016 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done @Accurimbono: The two works come from different editions (the former edited by Lundström, the latter by Gesner). There's IMHO no good reason to delete the former. --Alex brollo (disputatio) 13:18, 16 Iulii 2016 (UTC)

July 2016[recensere]

Liber:Tortelli - Orthographia Graeca.djvu: File has been deleted. 95.27.139.211 19:27, 5 Iulii 2016 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done The file has been kept. There's no reason to delete related Liber. --Alex brollo (disputatio) 13:08, 16 Iulii 2016 (UTC)


Liber:Theophrastus redivivus (Paris manuscript).pdf and Liber:Theophrastus redivivus (1659), Paris manuscript.pdf: File has been deleted. 95.27.139.211 19:27, 5 Iulii 2016 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done @Reedy: Really I don't agree with deletion of c:File:Theophrastus redivivus (Paris manuscript).pdf. A few pages of Liber:Theophrastus redivivus (Paris manuscript).pdf had been created. Reedy, can you consider to revert that deletion or to ask a commons sysop to revert it? --Alex brollo (disputatio) 12:54, 16 Iulii 2016 (UTC)

A undeletion request has been posted into Commons. Please post a comment there if you are interested about. --Alex brollo (disputatio) 18:49, 17 Iulii 2016 (UTC)


Liber:Le opere di Galileo Galilei VIII.djvu: no text in Latin. 95.27.139.211 19:27, 5 Iulii 2016 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done There are a few pages/parts of pages in Latin in the last part of the book. These pages should be shown into pagelist, but the Liber can't be deleted. --Alex brollo (disputatio) 12:23, 16 Iulii 2016 (UTC)


Liber:Sexti Empirici Adversus mathematicos: replaced with Liber:Sexti Empirici Adversus mathematicos.djvu. 95.27.139.211 19:27, 5 Iulii 2016 (UTC)

✔ Perfectum est. --Alex brollo (disputatio) 13:19, 16 Iulii 2016 (UTC)


Liber:Eugippius - Vita Sancti Severini.djvu: replaced with Liber:Vita Sancti Severini.djvu. 95.27.139.211 19:27, 5 Iulii 2016 (UTC)

✔ Perfectum est. --Alex brollo (disputatio) 13:19, 16 Iulii 2016 (UTC)
@Alex brollo: also Pagina:Eugippius - Vita Sancti Severini.djvu/1. Ratte (disputatio) 16:03, 16 Iulii 2016 (UTC)
✔ Perfectum est. Thanks! --Alex brollo (disputatio) 16:44, 16 Iulii 2016 (UTC)

May 2020[recensere]

  • I have no idea about the autor, the Latin is really miserable. I suggesst to wipe it away altogether. - OrbiliusMagister (disputatio) 17:04, 22 Maii 2020 (UTC)
  • Wikisource is not Wikipedia: notability is no problem at all as far as texts are concerned. Our paramount concerns are about copyright and the source of our text. Her ewe have somthing actually very dangerous: Lookhere: this text is an original Latin composition (and a very beautiful one), but it was written in 1960 by Francoisco Aloise (no news about him from Google) who was certainly active in 1960. You can read in the initial pages: "Depósito Legal L - 12 1958". Regretfully I am inclined to delete it. - OrbiliusMagister (disputatio) 17:04, 22 Maii 2020 (UTC)
  • that was my first thought; a work dated 1960 is almost certainly copyrighted... I think that, in absence of an evidence of the contrary, the safest choice is to delete it (we can eventually leave the author's page and the links to the works, but not knowing the date of his death, we cannot even know when this works will be in the public domain...) --Barbaking (disputatio) 13:25, 23 Maii 2020 (UTC)
  • @Barbaking: I also support deleting Franciscus Aloise's works due to copyright issues, and we should possibly also delete its author page as he will not have any work on Vikifons anymore. Veverve (disputatio) 15:52, 14 Iulii 2021 (UTC)
  • Cicero opera rhetorica I don't know what this is (or was supposed to be), but it seems abandoned since 2008, without a source and with very little useful contents (@OrbiliusMagister: per caso sai cosa sia? è il caso di migliorarla/wikificarla o si può cancellare?) --Barbaking (disputatio) 11:04, 22 Maii 2020 (UTC)
  • It is a stub of a list. No really valuable content and possibily unsourced original research: this is easy. --OrbiliusMagister (disputatio) 17:04, 22 Maii 2020 (UTC)
  • ✔ Perfectum est. (by orbilius)
  • Collationes: only an unformatted index, created and then abandoned in 2017. If someone wants to work on this text (which according to the source and to google is a book by w:Ioannes Cassianus) would probably find easier to start again from zero --Barbaking (disputatio) 14:02, 23 Maii 2020 (UTC)

January 2021[recensere]

✔ Perfectum est. deleted --Barbaking (disputatio) 08:39, 14 Iulii 2021 (UTC)

July 2021[recensere]

✔ Perfectum est.Barbaking (disputatio) 09:22, 11 Iulii 2021 (UTC)
  • Formula:TitulusPrecationis: as discussed here [in the template discussion page, see below], this template is a duplicate of {{titulus}} that does not provide cathegorization; in addition to what I wrote in the linked discussion, I honestly can’t see why Christian prayers should have a different titlebox from everything else (and even from other Christian texts!), so I propose to replace with the general {{titulus}} and delete —Barbaking (disputatio) 09:20, 11 Iulii 2021 (UTC)
I support the deletion and replacement, as I wrote in the discussion. Veverve (disputatio) 12:44, 11 Iulii 2021 (UTC)
✔ Perfectum est., the template has been replaced with {{Titulus}} and deleted; since I am going to also delete the discussion page, its contents are reported below: --Barbaking (disputatio) 08:37, 14 Iulii 2021 (UTC)
{{ping|Barbaking}} I feel this template should be updated to have the parameters you added to [[:Formula:Titulus]]. Or maybe this remplate should be deleted and replaced by [[:Formula:Titulus]], as the TitulusPrecationis template seems to be the same as Titulus, only with a blue colour and a small depition of Jesus Christ. [[Usor:Veverve|Veverve]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Veverve|disputatio]]) 17:33, 10 Iulii 2021 (UTC)
:{{Ping|Veverve}} yes, I have been wondering the same for some time; as it is now the Template is quite useless, since it does not provide cathegorization, and I see no point in updating the code making it a duplicate of {{Tl|titulus}} with a different visual output (also, having two templates with the same code means that if we change something in one of them, we must remember to do the same in the other one), so the best option is probably to replace with titulus and then delete it... i will look into it tomorrow if no one comes up with a better option —[[Usor:Barbaking|Barbaking]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Barbaking|disputatio]]) 09:14, 11 Iulii 2021 (UTC)
::{{ping|veverve}} for the sake of procedures, I opened a discussion on the matter in [[Vicifons:Deletiones Propositae]] —[[Usor:Barbaking|Barbaking]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Barbaking|disputatio]]) 09:24, 11 Iulii 2021 (UTC)

@Barbaking: was this template linked to any Wikidata item? Veverve (disputatio) 20:38, 15 Iulii 2021 (UTC)

@Veverve: it doesn't seem so, but I must admit I forgot to check :| --Barbaking (disputatio) 06:51, 16 Iulii 2021 (UTC)
+1 for me --Barbaking (disputatio) 07:40, 13 Iulii 2021 (UTC)